The doctor must assess the mental
capacity of the individual. This involves verifying that an individual
intending to fast does not have a mental impairment that would seriously
undermine the person’s ability to make health care decisions. Individuals with
seriously impaired mental capacity cannot be considered to be hunger strikers.
They need to be given treatment for their mental health problems rather than
allowed to fast in a manner that risks their health.
As early as possible, physicians should acquire a detailed and accurate medical
history of the person who is intending to fast. The medical implications of any
existing condition should be explained to the individual. Physicians should
verify that hunger strikers understand the potential health consequences of
fasting and forewarn them in plain language of the disadvantages. Physicians
should also explain how damage to health can be minimized or delayed by, for
example, increasing fluid intake. Since the person’s decisions regarding a
hunger strike can be momentous, ensuring full patient understanding of the
medical consequences is critical. Consistent with best practices for informed
consent in health care, the physician should ensure that the patient
understands the information conveyed by asking the patient to repeat back what
they understand.