The Pope and Catholic teachings
advocate a distinction between ordinary and extraordinary care, with ordinary
care being mandatory, whereas extraordinary care may be withheld or withdrawn.*
One commentator explicated this
distinction in the following way. According to him,
- Ordinary means of preserving life
are all medicines, treatments, and operations, which offer a reasonable
hope of benefit for the patient and which can be obtained and used without
excessive expense, pain, or inconvenience…
- Extraordinary means of preserving
life mean all medicines, treatments, and operations, which cannot be
obtained without excessive expense, pain, or other inconvenience, or
which, if used, would not offer reasonable hope of benefit.
Many ethicists and courts have concluded
that this distinction is too vague and has "too many conflicting
meanings" to be helpful in guiding surrogate decision makers and
clinicians As one lawyer noted ordinary and extraordinary are "extremely
fact–sensitive, relative terms…what is ordinary for one patient under
particular circumstances may be extraordinary for the same patient under
different circumstances, or for a different patient under the same
circumstances". Thus, the
ordinary/extraordinary distinction should not be used to justify decisions
about stopping treatment.
*Pope Pius XII. The prolongation of life In: Ethics in medicine. Reiser SJ, Dyck AJ, Curran WJ (Eds), MIT Press,Cambridge 1997.
*Pope Pius XII. The prolongation of life In: Ethics in medicine. Reiser SJ, Dyck AJ, Curran WJ (Eds), MIT Press,
No comments:
Post a Comment