Catholic teachings and the Pope
advocate a distinction between ordinary and extraordinary care, with ordinary
care being mandatory, whereas extraordinary care may be withheld or withdrawn.
One commentator explicated this distinction in the following way. According to him,
One commentator explicated this distinction in the following way. According to him,
- Ordinary means of preserving life include all
medicines, treatments and operations, which offer a reasonable hope of
benefit for the patient and which can be obtained and used without
excessive expense, pain, or inconvenience
- Extraordinary means of preserving life include all
medicines, treatments and operations, which cannot be obtained without
excessive expense, pain, or other inconvenience, or which, if used, would
not offer reasonable hope of benefit.
Many ethicists and courts have
concluded that this distinction is too vague and has "too many conflicting
meanings" to be helpful in guiding surrogate decision makers and
clinicians As one lawyer noted ordinary and extraordinary are "extremely
fact–sensitive, relative terms…what is ordinary for one patient under
particular circumstances may be extraordinary for the same patient under
different circumstances, or for a different patient under the same
circumstances". Thus, the ordinary/extraordinary distinction should not be
used to justify decisions about stopping treatment.
(Ref: Pope Pius XII. The prolongation of life. In: Ethics in medicine. Reiser SJ, Dyck AJ, Curran WJ (Eds), MIT Press,Cambridge 1997).
(Ref: Pope Pius XII. The prolongation of life. In: Ethics in medicine. Reiser SJ, Dyck AJ, Curran WJ (Eds), MIT Press,
No comments:
Post a Comment