Medical negligence
Gratuitously advices shall not be
considered liable when the actions are within the established medical
procedures
- Any doctor who is qualified by
medical council and renders emergency care or treatment to a person
suffering or appearing to suffer from cardiac arrest, which may include
the use of an automated external defibrillator, in good faith and without
compensation, shall be immune from civil liability for any personal injury
as a result of care or treatment or as a result of any act or failure to
act in providing or arranging further medical treatment where the person
acts as an ordinary prudent person would have acted under the same or
similar circumstances, except damages that may result for the gross
negligence of the person rendering emergency care. This immunity shall
extend to the licensed physician.
- If a doctor passes the scene of an
accident in which some person has been injured and is in need of urgent
medical attention he would not be held to have been negligent if he does
not render assistance, as no doctor/patient relationship has been
established and in consequences the doctor owes the patient no legal duty.
- If, however, the doctor goes to
the assistance of a person who is injured in an accident, a doctor
/patient relationship is at once established. When any physician
gratuitously advises medical personnel at the scene of an emergency
episode by direct voice contact, to render medical assistance based upon
information received by voice or biotelemetry equipment, the actions
ordered taken by the physician to sustain life or reduce disability shall
not be considered liable when the actions are within the established
medical procedures.
- A doctor has a duty to exercise
reasonable skill and care regardless of whether or not his services are
being given gratuitously. A national health policy is required to be
formulated to render emergency treatment to a person.
- If such a practitioner fails to
attend an emergency call and a complaint is made against him it may well
be that some disciplinary action will be taken against him by the health
authority/medical council.
The reader has a right to know and the contributor has a duty to disclose whether the views expressed are his own or whether he is quoting somebody.
ReplyDelete--M C Gupta