A doctor should not be dogmatic about
his opinion, and lawyers also should not expect him to be so. He should be
reasonable in his opinions and should not overstate the likelihood of a
relationship between cause and effect. The doctor should be ready to defend
every finding and conclusion on the report on clinical and scientific grounds
in the court of law. He should be aware of professional and scientific
viewpoints which might differ from his, and should be familiar with the latest
scientific literature in relation to the subject involved. For the purpose
of illustrating and clarifying his testimony in the court of law, the medical
expert may employ photographs, maps, diagrams, charts, X–rays, skeletons,
models, slides, films, tapes, etc., when they are properly verified. The doctor
should avoid talking too much, talking too soon, and talking to the wrong
persons. Prejudicial and sensational statements should not be made prior to
trial. Courts of law are open to the public and the junior doctors should
attend the Courts, where they can follow the proceedings, hear the evidence
given by their senior medical colleague as a witness, to familiarize themselves
with the procedures of the court of law.
No comments:
Post a Comment